• About
    • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?
  • Market Urbanism Podcast
  • Adam Hengels
  • Stephen Smith
  • Emily Hamilton
  • Jeff Fong
  • Nolan Gray
  • Contact

Market Urbanism

Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up

“Market Urbanism” refers to the synthesis of classical liberal economics and ethics (market), with an appreciation of the urban way of life and its benefits to society (urbanism). We advocate for the emergence of bottom up solutions to urban issues, as opposed to ones imposed from the top down.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Podcast
  • Economics
  • housing
  • planning
  • Transportation
  • zoning
  • Urban[ism] Legends
  • How to Fight Gentrification
  • Culture of Congestion by Sandy Ikeda
  • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?

What’s Scott Alexander asking, anyway?

May 10, 2023 By Salim Furth

In a pair of posts, Scott Alexander goads his mostly-YIMBY readers by claiming to believe that density is likely to increase prices.

To quantify his readers’ views, he laid out a thought experiment in a Google poll, the results of which we’ll no doubt see in a few days. You can see the poll – and my answer – below.

As a YIMBY scholar, I mood-affiliate with the first answer, but I chose the middle one because there is a fundamental misunderstanding between pro-housing people like me and Scott’s recent posts.

Housing growth is not the same as city densification

Scott’s experiment isn’t a “housing growth” experiment, it’s a “city densification” experiment. Crucially, he requires “proportional increases in the number of office buildings, schools, etc”. That is, the experiment would increase office space at the same pace as housing even though office vacancy rates (19%) are far higher than housing vacancy rates (~1.7%).

Oakland is a pretty balanced city: as best I can tell from simple Census data, it probably has a jobs/residents ratio pretty close to the California average (by contrast, San Francisco has twice the state jobs/resident ratio). If Scott ran his experiment in a bedroom community, or stipulated that office space is left under current regulations, I’d have an easy time coming down on the “less expensive” side of the ledger.

The point of the YIMBY movement is that housing faces uniquely strict regulation. California cities (and those in some other states) believe that offices and industrial uses are “taxpayers”, generating more revenue than they use in services. Housing is viewed as a fiscal cost. Regulation (“fiscal zoning“) and discretionary decisions have reflected this bias for decades. The result is headlines like “SF added jobs eight times faster than housing since 2010.”

If Oakland upzoned citywide, it would likely receive a disproportionate amount of residential growth relative to offices and industry. That would lower rents relative to the baseline trajectory.

Scott’s question feels slippery because at first it sounds like he’s asking, “what would happen if we built a lot of housing?”, but in the details he’s asking, “what would happen if this city densified without changing any proportions.”

Thought experiments

The second, detailed question doesn’t neatly correspond to a simple comparative statics exercise in an Alonso-Mills-Muth city model. Depending on a variety of things like the congestion elasticity, people’s taste/distaste for density, and the degree to which regulation has held back density in the baseline, the price effects could go either way.

(If I had to try to run this experiment through an
Alonso-Mills-Muth model, I’d do it by imposing citywide regulation, removing the regulation for a section of the city, but also exogenously increasing the city wage. The first effect lowers prices, the second raises prices, and there are some externalities that are even trickier to think about. It’s a firm case of “too much going on here, we can’t give you an answer”).

There are some easier questions that urban economics models are well-equipped to answer:

  • Are large cities cheaper or more expensive than small cities?
    • More expensive. The only way they get bigger is by having higher wages or more amenities. That draws in greater demand, with prices at the exurban fringe being nearly equal everywhere, and then prices growing the closer to downtown you go. By the same logic, denser areas are dense because they’re more expensive, not vice versa.
    • This is roughly the same logic as “Do people get wetter on days they carry umbrellas?”
  • What happens to prices when a city removes housing density regulation?
    • Housing prices fall, the population grows, and housing space per person rises.
Development in Oakland
Tweet

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Market Urbanism Podcast

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Rubbing Shoulders: Maybe
  • Is there really a building boom? Not as much as you might think
  • Pedestrianized streets usually fail – and that’s OK
  • Solano County Dreamin’: Is there a market urbanist way to build a new city?
  • Are Republicans or Democrats more pro-housing? Yes.
  • Gentrification: An LVT Would Do That
  • Will congestion pricing hurt cities?
  • New Report on Massachusetts’s Building Code Confirms: It’s Harder to Build Energy-Efficient Housing When You Don’t Let People Build Anything
  • Rhode Island’s housing process package
  • Why lawyer salaries matter
  • On coexistence
  • Detroit: LVT would fix that
My Tweets

Market Sites Urbanists should check out

  • Cafe Hayek
  • Culture of Congestion
  • Environmental and Urban Economics
  • Foundation for Economic Education
  • Let A Thousand Nations Bloom
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Mike Munger | Kids Prefer Cheese
  • Neighborhood Effects
  • New Urbs
  • NYU Stern Urbanization Project
  • Parafin
  • Peter Gordon's Blog
  • Propmodo
  • The Beacon
  • ThinkMarkets

Urbanism Sites capitalists should check out

  • Austin Contrarian
  • City Comforts
  • City Notes | Daniel Kay Hertz
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Emergent Urbanism
  • Granola Shotgun
  • Old Urbanist
  • Pedestrian Observations
  • Planetizen Radar
  • Reinventing Parking
  • streetsblog
  • Strong Towns
  • Systemic Failure
  • The Micro Maker
  • The Urbanophile

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 Market Urbanism

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.