• About
  • Adam Hengels
  • Emily Hamilton
  • Michael Lewyn
  • Salim Furth
  • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?
  • Contact

Market Urbanism

Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up

“Market Urbanism” refers to the synthesis of classical liberal economics and ethics (market), with an appreciation of the urban way of life and its benefits to society (urbanism). We advocate for the emergence of bottom up solutions to urban issues, as opposed to ones imposed from the top down.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Economics
  • housing
  • planning
  • Zoning
  • Urban[ism] Legends
  • Book Reviews

20/20 Segment on Private Roads (& Some things to ponder while in traffic)

March 16, 2009 By Adam Hengels

Some other things to ponder for the next time you are sitting on a congested highway…

When I talk to people about tolling roads, most people immediately reject the idea entirely.  I like to ask them to think about it next time they are in a traffic jam.  Hey, if you sit in traffic, you probably spend a lot of time thinking…  So, next time you are waiting for the car ahead of them to move, think of what dollar amount you would be willing to pay to avoid the traffic jam in order to get to your destination. 

Then, think of waiting in a long bread line, as if the only source of food were free government bread.  Obviously, the bread is underpriced.  How much would you be willing to pay for a loaf of bread to avoid the line?  Recall the price you were willing to pay to avoid traffic and ask yourself whether roads are priced correctly. 

Interestingly, almost all people are fully willing to pay for bread, a staple of life, while we tend to think of roads as “too important to leave to private companies.”  So from now on, think of a bread line every time you are sitting in traffic.

After a few commutes, you might be ready for some more thinking on the subject.  Once you’ve learned to recognize the socialism of the highways, think about how tolled roads might affect where you decide to live.  Would you live further away from your destination, and gladly pay for a congestion-free commute?  Or would you choose to live closer to work, to pay less in tolls? 

Now, keeping in mind that most highways are congestion-free when they are originally built, ponder how socialized roads effect living patterns.  Had roads been priced properly, would the outlying areas of your metropolitan area have developed as they did?

Tweet

Filed Under: privatization, Transportation Tagged With: congestion, congestion pricing, highways, Private Roads, privatization

About Adam Hengels

Adam is passionate about urbanism, and founded this site in 2007, after realizing that classical liberals and urbanists actually share many objectives, despite being at odds in many spheres of the intellectual discussion. His mission is to improve the urban experience, and overcome obstacles that prevent aspiring city dwellers from living where they want. http://www.marketurbanism.com/adam-hengels/

Comments

  1. Rob says

    March 16, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Interesting analogy. It’s ironic that the people who suffer the most from excessive traffic are often the ones most vehemently opposed to policy like tolled roads or congestion pricing.

  2. Rob says

    March 16, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Interesting analogy. It’s ironic that the people who suffer the most from excessive traffic are often the ones most vehemently opposed to policy like tolled roads or congestion pricing.

  3. Andy Sharpe says

    March 16, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    I would hope that this would encourage mass transit. Driving is already expensive enough with the cost of buying/leasing a car, maintaining the car, filling the car up with gas, and parking (for some). Hopefully, this added cost would be the final straw for some drivers, being an impetus to switch to rail, light rail, or bus transit.

  4. Andy Sharpe says

    March 16, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    I would hope that this would encourage mass transit. Driving is already expensive enough with the cost of buying/leasing a car, maintaining the car, filling the car up with gas, and parking (for some). Hopefully, this added cost would be the final straw for some drivers, being an impetus to switch to rail, light rail, or bus transit.

  5. MarketUrbanism says

    March 16, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    Great point Andy. Transit will have a hard time competing with roads that politicians love to pump money into…

    Private transit might even make a comeback if roads were priced appropriately.

  6. Market Urbanism says

    March 16, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    Great point Andy. Transit will have a hard time competing with roads that politicians love to pump money into…

    Private transit might even make a comeback if roads were priced appropriately.

  7. Jessie M says

    March 18, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    It depends really. I’m not always in a rush to get where I’m going. Sitting in traffic isn’t something I want to do but will most of the time. It doesn’t bother me that much.

    We do have some toll roads here in Houston. When I’m in a rush or don’t feel like sitting in traffic, that’s when I take it. But most often, I’d rather keep my money in my wallet and sit in traffic.

  8. Jessie M says

    March 18, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    It depends really. I’m not always in a rush to get where I’m going. Sitting in traffic isn’t something I want to do but will most of the time. It doesn’t bother me that much.

    We do have some toll roads here in Houston. When I’m in a rush or don’t feel like sitting in traffic, that’s when I take it. But most often, I’d rather keep my money in my wallet and sit in traffic.

  9. Bill Nelson says

    March 19, 2009 at 2:26 am

    Underpriced roads preform well below capacity; when they fail, there is almost no throughput.

    Properly priced roads would maximize capacity and permit many more cars through, hence making outlying areas more attractive. Think of a properly-priced road as delivering the extra capacity of a few more lanes.

    As it is, congested roads are very expensive to use. Not in tolls, obviously, but in time. A $300/hour lawyer who sits in traffic for an hour every day is paying a daily toll of $300. And that is why congested “free” roads discourage long commutes.

    That lawyer would probably choose a shorter commute to a “free” congested commute — from his suburban house to his suburban office. If he had to pay a $20 toll to avoid traffic, he might consider moving to the city.

  10. Bill Nelson says

    March 19, 2009 at 2:26 am

    Underpriced roads preform well below capacity; when they fail, there is almost no throughput.

    Properly priced roads would maximize capacity and permit many more cars through, hence making outlying areas more attractive. Think of a properly-priced road as delivering the extra capacity of a few more lanes.

    As it is, congested roads are very expensive to use. Not in tolls, obviously, but in time. A $300/hour lawyer who sits in traffic for an hour every day is paying a daily toll of $300. And that is why congested “free” roads discourage long commutes.

    That lawyer would probably choose a shorter commute to a “free” congested commute — from his suburban house to his suburban office. If he had to pay a $20 toll to avoid traffic, he might consider moving to the city.

  11. Bill Nelson says

    March 19, 2009 at 2:29 am

    Correction:

    If the lawyer had to pay a $20 toll to avoid traffic, he might consider *commuting* to the city. (Or maybe living in the city and commuting to his suburban office…)

    Sorry!

  12. Bill Nelson says

    March 19, 2009 at 2:29 am

    Correction:

    If the lawyer had to pay a $20 toll to avoid traffic, he might consider *commuting* to the city. (Or maybe living in the city and commuting to his suburban office…)

    Sorry!

  13. MarketUrbanism says

    March 20, 2009 at 3:07 am

    welcome back, Bill. Long time, no comment.

  14. Market Urbanism says

    March 20, 2009 at 3:07 am

    welcome back, Bill. Long time, no comment.

Trackbacks

  1. Streetsblog » Traffic: Serious as a Heart Attack says:
    March 16, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    […] at Market Urbanism, there’s more talk about traffic — and the free-market argument for road pricing. At Seattle’s […]

  2. Three Interesting Reads | neoHOUSTON says:
    April 2, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    […] 20/20 Segment on Private Roads From Market Urbanism, a look at the difference between public and private roads. Must read, must watch. Share this post: […]

  3. Stossel On Private Roads « Daniel Joseph Smith says:
    August 31, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    […] Stossel On Private Roads By Daniel J. Smith http://www.marketurbanism.com/2009/03/16/2020-segment-on-private-roads-some-things-to-ponder-while-in-tr… […]

Listen in

  • Abundance
  • Conversations with Tyler
  • Densely Speaking
  • Ideas of India
  • Order Without Design
  • UCLA Housing Voice
  • Yeoman

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Market Sites Urbanists should check out

  • Arpitrage
  • Cafe Hayek
  • Center for Building in North America blog
  • Construction Physics
  • Conversable Economist
  • Environmental and Urban Economics | Matt Kahn
  • Erdmann Housing Tracker
  • Foundation for Economic Education
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Marginal Revolution University
  • Parafin
  • Propmodo
  • Rent Free
  • Time & Space
  • Urbanomics

Urbanism Sites capitalists should check out

  • Caos Planejado
  • City Density
  • Cornerstone
  • Granola Shotgun
  • Important Readings in Urbanism
  • Kartografia Ekstremalna
  • Metropolitan Abundance Project
  • Pedestrian Observations
  • Planetizen
  • Reinventing Parking
  • Skynomics Blog
  • StreetsBlog USA
  • Strong Towns
  • The Corner Side Yard | Pete Saunders
  • YIMBY Alliance

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 Market Urbanism