The good old days weren’t so good

Preservationists treat pre-1950 architecture as “historic” and irreplaceable, while often criticizing new building on a variety of aesthetic grounds. In his new book The Unfinished Metropolis, Benjamin Schneider points out that today’s historic buildings weren’t so popular when they were new either. He cites a 19th-c. architecture critic who described Victorian row houses as “nightmares of an architect’s brain… piled out without rhyme or reason- restless, turreted, loaded up with meaningless detail.” (page 51).

Michael Lewyn
Michael Lewyn
Articles: 129

One comment

  1. I found the article insightful! It challenges the reverence for old architecture, reminding us that modern buildings faced similar criticism. Its a thought-provoking perspective on urban development and historical preservation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *