• About
    • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?
  • Market Urbanism Podcast
  • Adam Hengels
  • Stephen Smith
  • Emily Hamilton
  • Jeff Fong
  • Nolan Gray
  • Contact

Market Urbanism

Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up

“Market Urbanism” refers to the synthesis of classical liberal economics and ethics (market), with an appreciation of the urban way of life and its benefits to society (urbanism). We advocate for the emergence of bottom up solutions to urban issues, as opposed to ones imposed from the top down.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Podcast
  • Economics
  • housing
  • planning
  • Transportation
  • zoning
  • Urban[ism] Legends
  • How to Fight Gentrification
  • Culture of Congestion by Sandy Ikeda
  • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?

Urban Density, Mass Transit, and Uber

September 9, 2015 By Jeff Fong

Over at FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver and Rueben Fischer-Baum claim mass transit is Uber’s best friend. 

They use data from New York to show that Uber is most frequently used in areas with effective mass transit. They explain that residents in areas with poor access to mass transit are more likely to assume the fixed cost of car ownership. Once that overhead has been assumed, these residents are more likely to use the personal vehicle they’re already paying for rather than rely on alternative modes of transportation. There’s variation in use depending on the intersection of income level and transit accessibility, but that the big takeaway is that mass transit supports Uber. And that Uber as well as other TNCs will be most successful where effective mass transit is already in place.

It’s a great analysis. And it’s partially right–but not entirely.

At 27,000 residents per square mile, NYC has the highest population density of any city in the U.S.

At 27,000 residents per square mile, NYC has the highest population density of any city in the U.S.

 

Mass transit does support TNC growth just as the authors describe. But TNCs, in turn, support mass transit by solving the last mile problem. The two systems are complementary. But without a supportive urban environment, neither system stands any chance of success. Mass transit and TNCs may be allies, but both rely on urban density as their benefactor.

Residents in densely developed cities with mixed land use consume less transportation per capita because the distances between work, housing, and recreation are all much shorter. And below a certain level of consumption, the minimum fixed cost of car ownership ceases to make sense. Alternative forms of transportation like a mass transit system or a TNC platform entail only marginal cost, so they begin to look more attractive.

Imagine putting a mass transit system–commuter rail, BRT, whatever you’d like–in the middle of Houston or LA style sprawl. It might be a net positive for a TNC, but in no way would it be as beneficial as if those cities had Manhattan levels of density. To take an empirical approach, the authors’ analysis could be reapplied to Uber use in city like Atlanta. Atlanta has mass transit and TNCs along with urban sprawl.

While mass transit does support TNC use, it’s not the single biggest variable in getting people to give up their cars. That has to do with shifting the relative costs of car ownership in favor of a multi-modal alternative. And that has everything to do with embracing urban density.

Tweet

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Jeff Fong

Jeff writes about technology, markets, and policy. He's spent most of his professional career at on-demand logistics platforms like Lyft and Postmates. He also serves on the board of Yimby Action, a policy advocacy organization dedicated to housing and land use reform.

Comments

  1. JohnThackr says

    September 9, 2015 at 10:05 am

    I also wish that their article had mentioned dollar vans and other semi-legal private transit used by the poor, rather than pretending that they didn’t exist. Dollar vans right now do what Uber is only talking about with UberPool.

  2. Kenny Easwaran says

    September 10, 2015 at 12:06 am

    Do you know if anyone has actually done the analysis on Los Angeles? I remember that when I was living there, Lyft (and Uber of course) was anecdotally making a huge difference in people’s lives. And there are definitely parts of the city where transit has a significant modeshare. If anything, I’ve always thought Los Angeles had the biggest potential to benefit from TNCs, because there’s a large supply of underemployed people with cars, and a geography and transit system that makes it quite sensible to take transit out to a bar and TNC back home.

  3. Jeff Fong says

    September 10, 2015 at 6:06 pm

    Not to my knowledge, but it’s possible something exists. Part of the empirical problem is you’d need a pooling of data between all the public transit providers and all the TNCs, something that’s not feasible at present.

  4. Jeff Fong says

    September 10, 2015 at 6:08 pm

    Wasn’t my intent to ignore the rest of the transit eco-system. I think these other services are hugely interesting and absolutely vital, but they weren’t germane to addressing the thesis that mass transit will be the single biggest factor in TNC growth versus car ownership.

  5. Green2u says

    September 14, 2015 at 3:43 pm

    So interesting as Uber here in ATL has recently done a major promotion re taking Uber to/from MARTA. In fact, I’ve done just that!

Trackbacks

  1. Infrasystems’ transition to sustainability: a comment on Kaijser’s text and its applicability in the sharing economy | European post-master in Urbanism|student-blog says:
    December 6, 2015 at 3:08 pm

    […] shows, sometimes these new infrasystems become complementary to traditional ones – like Uber solving the last mile problem of public transport. Economists predict further collaboration and integration of the sharing economy, with multiple […]

  2. Making Mass Transit Easier With Mobile Data and Payments - Fortune says:
    December 31, 2015 at 11:47 am

    […] stations. Having mass transit and ride-hailing services under the same digital roof helps riders solve the “last mile” problem—how to get from a train station to your front door—that is widely believed to hold down mass […]

Market Urbanism Podcast

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Book Review: HIAHP
  • Resources for Reformers: Houston’s minimum lot sizes
  • Xiaodi Li, Misunderstood
  • The Homeownership Society Can Be Fixed
  • Do The Cities Need The Suburbs?
  • Welcome Michael Nahas
  • The fallacy of total rent regulation
  • Should governments nudge land assembly?
  • The conspiracy theory of rent increases
  • Herbert Hoover reconsidered
  • YIMBYs and liberals
  • Introducing Szymon Pifczyk
My Tweets

Market Sites Urbanists should check out

  • Cafe Hayek
  • Culture of Congestion
  • Environmental and Urban Economics
  • Foundation for Economic Education
  • Let A Thousand Nations Bloom
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Mike Munger | Kids Prefer Cheese
  • Neighborhood Effects
  • New Urbs
  • NYU Stern Urbanization Project
  • Parafin
  • Peter Gordon's Blog
  • Propmodo
  • The Beacon
  • ThinkMarkets

Urbanism Sites capitalists should check out

  • Austin Contrarian
  • City Comforts
  • City Notes | Daniel Kay Hertz
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Emergent Urbanism
  • Granola Shotgun
  • Old Urbanist
  • Pedestrian Observations
  • Planetizen Radar
  • Reinventing Parking
  • streetsblog
  • Strong Towns
  • Systemic Failure
  • The Micro Maker
  • The Urbanophile

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 Market Urbanism

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.