Comments on: The Status of Smart Growth Regulation https://marketurbanism.com/2014/10/24/the-status-of-smart-growth-regulation/ Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:30:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.1 By: Environment roundup - Overlawyered https://marketurbanism.com/2014/10/24/the-status-of-smart-growth-regulation/#comment-20272 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:30:10 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=4082#comment-20272 […] by some advocates of the free market, many Smart Growth tenets are actually deregulatory.” [Emily Washington, Market Urbanism; related, obnoxious-yet-informative […]

]]> By: Ervin https://marketurbanism.com/2014/10/24/the-status-of-smart-growth-regulation/#comment-20261 Wed, 05 Nov 2014 01:32:00 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=4082#comment-20261 Check out my new urban development blog…still a work in progress but give it a look…

http://the703record.blogspot.com/

]]> By: Which Calls for More Regulation, Sprawl or Smart Growth? | Smart Growth for Conservatives https://marketurbanism.com/2014/10/24/the-status-of-smart-growth-regulation/#comment-20259 Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:09:10 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=4082#comment-20259 […] in the Market Urbanism blog, Emily Washington provides a useful gloss on the Lewyn-Jackson […]

]]> By: Owen https://marketurbanism.com/2014/10/24/the-status-of-smart-growth-regulation/#comment-20253 Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:14:00 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=4082#comment-20253 Are Lewyn and Jackson code names for Rip Van Winkle? That style of state abbreviations was old fashioned in the 1960s and deprecated in official documents and style guides by the 1980s.

Green building codes are not smart growth. LEED and the like are run by consultants who certify based on how much you have paid in consulting fees. Green building certification is corruption, not smart. And the result is usually even more harmful to the environment than established construction practices.

]]>