Comments on: Does Urban Farming Make Sense? https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/ Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:30:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.1 By: Angelo Eno https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-11107 Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:34:00 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-11107 I took a shot at estimating the opportunity cost of one of these towers in NYC a while back.
led holiday lights

]]>
By: Bill Nelson https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-64 Tue, 20 May 2008 12:48:57 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-64 Quiz: Let’s say we have two identical buildings, next to each other, in a dense city. Mine is filled with orange trees, and yours is filled with medical offices, advertising agencies, etc. After one year, which building will have produced more oranges?

If the answer is my building, then all that is needed is a zoning change, and the profit motive will do the rest.

If the answer is your building, then massive subsidies (or a philanthropist) would be needed to replace the office building with orange trees. Such subsidies would be taken from taxpayers in exchange for…a smaller chance of so-called “global warming”?

Faith rests on the unmeasurable and unverifiable. And it’s in the name of faith that people can be most easily duped into anything.

The environmental problem was solved long ago by the accumulation of wealth that enabled people to buy clean air. Poor people cannot afford catalytic converters, poor companies cannot afford efficient technologies, and people in rich countries can pay people in poor countries to produce pollution (and simultaneously make them better off).

One more thing: Agriculture is filthy business. Pesticides, fertilizer runoff, animal waste, flies, and so forth are not part of the romantic image of the “family farm” and so are generally not considered by the urban population.

And besides, we already have urban agriculture. It’s called a “plant nursery”. No subsidies needed.

]]>
By: Bill Nelson https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-8390 Tue, 20 May 2008 12:48:00 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-8390 Quiz: Let’s say we have two identical buildings, next to each other, in a dense city. Mine is filled with orange trees, and yours is filled with medical offices, advertising agencies, etc. After one year, which building will have produced more oranges?

If the answer is my building, then all that is needed is a zoning change, and the profit motive will do the rest.

If the answer is your building, then massive subsidies (or a philanthropist) would be needed to replace the office building with orange trees. Such subsidies would be taken from taxpayers in exchange for…a smaller chance of so-called “global warming”?

Faith rests on the unmeasurable and unverifiable. And it’s in the name of faith that people can be most easily duped into anything.

The environmental problem was solved long ago by the accumulation of wealth that enabled people to buy clean air. Poor people cannot afford catalytic converters, poor companies cannot afford efficient technologies, and people in rich countries can pay people in poor countries to produce pollution (and simultaneously make them better off).

One more thing: Agriculture is filthy business. Pesticides, fertilizer runoff, animal waste, flies, and so forth are not part of the romantic image of the “family farm” and so are generally not considered by the urban population.

And besides, we already have urban agriculture. It’s called a “plant nursery”. No subsidies needed.

]]>
By: Market Urbanism https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-63 Tue, 20 May 2008 01:41:48 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-63 I also added you to the blogroll.

]]>
By: MarketUrbanism https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-8389 Tue, 20 May 2008 01:41:00 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-8389 I also added you to the blogroll.

]]>
By: Market Urbanism https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-62 Tue, 20 May 2008 01:39:12 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-62 Thanks. I added a link to your article from the post.

]]>
By: MarketUrbanism https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-8388 Tue, 20 May 2008 01:39:00 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-8388 Thanks. I added a link to your article from the post.

]]>
By: AC https://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-61 Tue, 20 May 2008 01:28:36 +0000 http://www.marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-61 Nice analysis. #4 is the biggest reason, I think. I took a shot at estimating the opportunity cost of one of these towers in NYC a while back. http://austinzoning.typepad.com/austincontrarian/2007/05/very_very_expen.htmlA

]]>