Comments on: Neighborhood Walkability Scores http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/19/neighborhood-walkability-scores/ Urbanism for Capitalists / Capitalism for Urbanists Sun, 20 May 2012 15:18:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: FSBO http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/19/neighborhood-walkability-scores/#comment-1556 FSBO Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:35:40 +0000 http://marketurbanism.com/?p=181#comment-1556 What can I do if the walk score is very low? You know, I’ve found rather interesting way called drive score. Using the software developed by Fizber company http://drivescore.fizber.com/ I you have the opportunity to choose what to use – walk, drive or bike score. It’s very useful while selling a house. You can show it from advantageous position. You’ll try too. What can I do if the walk score is very low? You know, I’ve found rather interesting way called drive score. Using the software developed by Fizber company http://drivescore.fizber.com/ I you have the opportunity to choose what to use – walk, drive or bike score. It’s very useful while selling a house. You can show it from advantageous position. You’ll try too.

]]> By: FSBO http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/19/neighborhood-walkability-scores/#comment-8527 FSBO Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:35:00 +0000 http://marketurbanism.com/?p=181#comment-8527 What can I do if the walk score is very low? You know, I’ve found rather interesting way called drive score. Using the software developed by Fizber company http://drivescore.fizber.com/ I you have the opportunity to choose what to use – walk, drive or bike score. It’s very useful while selling a house. You can show it from advantageous position. You’ll try too. What can I do if the walk score is very low? You know, I’ve found rather interesting way called drive score. Using the software developed by Fizber company http://drivescore.fizber.com/ I you have the opportunity to choose what to use – walk, drive or bike score. It’s very useful while selling a house. You can show it from advantageous position. You’ll try too.

]]> By: Market Urbanism http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/19/neighborhood-walkability-scores/#comment-804 Market Urbanism Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:31:26 +0000 http://marketurbanism.com/?p=181#comment-804 I think you can alter the parameters of what you consider "walkable", but I haven't played with that... I think you can alter the parameters of what you consider “walkable”, but I haven’t played with that…

]]> By: MarketUrbanism http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/19/neighborhood-walkability-scores/#comment-8526 MarketUrbanism Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:31:00 +0000 http://marketurbanism.com/?p=181#comment-8526 I think you can alter the parameters of what you consider "walkable", but I haven't played with that... I think you can alter the parameters of what you consider “walkable”, but I haven’t played with that…

]]> By: Bill Nelson http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/19/neighborhood-walkability-scores/#comment-801 Bill Nelson Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:37:25 +0000 http://marketurbanism.com/?p=181#comment-801 FWIW, the walk scores seem heavily biased towards local retail -- and against recreation. I checked a couple of places in which I lived: A) Lots of scattered third-rate stores in an area with few pedestrians. B) The lack of almost any convenient shopping, but plenty of scenic parklands & woods filled with local strollers, dog walkers, etc. "A" scored an 80 and "B" scored a "40". Buyer beware. FWIW, the walk scores seem heavily biased towards local retail — and against recreation.

I checked a couple of places in which I lived:

A) Lots of scattered third-rate stores in an area with few pedestrians.

B) The lack of almost any convenient shopping, but plenty of scenic parklands & woods filled with local strollers, dog walkers, etc.

“A” scored an 80 and “B” scored a “40″.

Buyer beware.

]]> By: Bill Nelson http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/19/neighborhood-walkability-scores/#comment-8525 Bill Nelson Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:37:00 +0000 http://marketurbanism.com/?p=181#comment-8525 FWIW, the walk scores seem heavily biased towards local retail -- and against recreation. I checked a couple of places in which I lived: A) Lots of scattered third-rate stores in an area with few pedestrians. B) The lack of almost any convenient shopping, but plenty of scenic parklands & woods filled with local strollers, dog walkers, etc. "A" scored an 80 and "B" scored a "40". Buyer beware. FWIW, the walk scores seem heavily biased towards local retail — and against recreation.

I checked a couple of places in which I lived:

A) Lots of scattered third-rate stores in an area with few pedestrians.

B) The lack of almost any convenient shopping, but plenty of scenic parklands & woods filled with local strollers, dog walkers, etc.

“A” scored an 80 and “B” scored a “40″.

Buyer beware.

]]>