<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ikea Provides Private Transportation, Santiago-Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/08/ikea-provides-private-transportation-santiago-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/08/ikea-provides-private-transportation-santiago-style/</link>
	<description>Urbanism for Capitalists / Capitalism for Urbanists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Market Urbanism</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/08/ikea-provides-private-transportation-santiago-style/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Urbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=141#comment-414</guid>
		<description>The transportation itself isn&#039;t &quot;for profit&quot; since they aren&#039;t charging for the ride.  However, by providing transportation, it brings more customers to the stores, which they hope will boost sales.

Ikea needs large pieces of land for it&#039;s stores, and there aren&#039;t many large pieces of land in New York City.  So, they chose a part of Brooklyn where there are large pieces of land available.  

This area of Brooklyn, called Red Hook, is very close to the expressway, but not very accessible to public transportation.  Since most of Ikea&#039;s target customers (at least in NYC) use public transportation, they decided it makes sense to provide buses to encourage customers to shop at their store.  I&#039;m sure it is worth it for Ikea.  Plus, as you noted, it doubles as a mobile advertisement.  NYC is probably the only place in the US where it makes economic sense to do this on such a large scale.

If they charged, I don&#039;t think they would charge Ikea customers very much.  But, it may be profitable to charge non-customers if it&#039;s so popular.  I&#039;m not sure if there is a law that prevents them from charging, but I&#039;m willing to bet that they would have to pay some huge surcharge like the Supper Shuttles from the airport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The transportation itself isn&#8217;t &#8220;for profit&#8221; since they aren&#8217;t charging for the ride.  However, by providing transportation, it brings more customers to the stores, which they hope will boost sales.</p>
<p>Ikea needs large pieces of land for it&#8217;s stores, and there aren&#8217;t many large pieces of land in New York City.  So, they chose a part of Brooklyn where there are large pieces of land available.  </p>
<p>This area of Brooklyn, called Red Hook, is very close to the expressway, but not very accessible to public transportation.  Since most of Ikea&#8217;s target customers (at least in NYC) use public transportation, they decided it makes sense to provide buses to encourage customers to shop at their store.  I&#8217;m sure it is worth it for Ikea.  Plus, as you noted, it doubles as a mobile advertisement.  NYC is probably the only place in the US where it makes economic sense to do this on such a large scale.</p>
<p>If they charged, I don&#8217;t think they would charge Ikea customers very much.  But, it may be profitable to charge non-customers if it&#8217;s so popular.  I&#8217;m not sure if there is a law that prevents them from charging, but I&#8217;m willing to bet that they would have to pay some huge surcharge like the Supper Shuttles from the airport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wait What?</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/08/ikea-provides-private-transportation-santiago-style/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Wait What?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=141#comment-413</guid>
		<description>This is awesome and it is blowing my mind.  You call this &quot;for-profit transportation&quot; but is it really?  Why is it free?  Does it accomplish advertising any better than the stupid glass furniture trucks they drive around town?  If the law were the only thing preventing them from charging, why do they bother driving at all?  What are they getting out of this?  Someone help me out here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome and it is blowing my mind.  You call this &#8220;for-profit transportation&#8221; but is it really?  Why is it free?  Does it accomplish advertising any better than the stupid glass furniture trucks they drive around town?  If the law were the only thing preventing them from charging, why do they bother driving at all?  What are they getting out of this?  Someone help me out here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Urbanism</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/08/ikea-provides-private-transportation-santiago-style/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Urbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=141#comment-410</guid>
		<description>or subject to a big surcharge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or subject to a big surcharge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Smith</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/08/ikea-provides-private-transportation-santiago-style/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=141#comment-409</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Ikea would love to charge those people who want to pay, but I&#039;d bet anything that it would be illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Ikea would love to charge those people who want to pay, but I&#8217;d bet anything that it would be illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
