Subscribe to Market Urbanism

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe to the audio version

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Book Store

Book Store

“Green” Parking Garage in Chicago. Oxymoron?


Developer, Al Friedman plans to build a “green” parking garage in Chicago’s Streeterville neighborhood, where development has replaced many surface lots. (Crain’s)

Environmentally speaking, it’s probably better than a surface lot and frees up more space for productive development. But, can the structure itself being green offset the environmental effects of the cars using it? Is this a lesser of evils? Or is making a parking structure “green” a wasted effort?

What do you think?

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • e-mail
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

Related Posts:

  • T.C. O'Rourke
    Yes.

    Next question.
  • Robert
    Another "Green" building, this has unfortunately lost its favor as the first response put it very well. However a parking garage is a key element in creating an urban setting; bringing people in to the city, removing cars from the road and people to the street or transit. And most all if this is a successful venture it proves to be a win-win for capitalist developers and urbanist who should be happy to see a consolidation of parking lots into a multi-layered structure.
  • Here's an interesting article by Don Boudreaux about "green":

    http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/...

    What do you think?
  • I wouldn't say a garage needs to offset environmental effects of the driver. A garage is a garage. It doesn't use much energy, although the cars it stores do.

    If the demand for parking tells Mr. Friedman to build a garage, why not?... But, to claim a garage is "green" is a stretch.
  • Bill Nelson
    Why should a garage need to offset "environmental effects", or for that matter, serve any purpose other than a place to park your car? Sure, it might be "green" -- or it might be "low carbs" or "organic" or what have you, but that's a marketing gimmick to appeal to (unfortunate) popular tastes.

    Parking is difficult in that area (at least by non-NYC standards), so now it will be a little more competitive with other areas in (and around) Chicago. If you like to see people in the city center, then they had better be able to park -- or you won't see them there at all.

    Especially in Chicago, where any overlap between subway stations and active/desirable areas is strictly coincidental.
  • I would definitely chalk it up to a marketing gimmick, since I would argue that a genuinely green person would walk or bike to work.

    The real news may be that green sells, regardless if it's really environmentally friendly.
  • Hm. It seems that "green" has morphed from a scientific argument/debate to a religion to a way of life to a marketing gimmick. Seems that the enviro crowd would rather park their Priuses (is that the correct pluralization?) in a "green" parking lot than one of another color. And, in an upscale urban neighborhood "green" is hip.

    "Mr. Friedman said going green seemed the right thing to do for a neighborhood known for its youthful spirit."

    Perhaps it's more about that than anything else.

    But, you're absolutely right - green parking garages do indeed seem like an oxymoron. But, hey - you can plug in your electric car there, so all is well!

    Thanks for your post!
blog comments powered by Disqus