<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Urban Farming Make Sense?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/</link>
	<description>Urbanism for Capitalists / Capitalism for Urbanists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo Eno</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-11107</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo Eno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-11107</guid>
		<description>I took a shot at estimating the opportunity cost of one of these towers in NYC a while back.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightenergydesigns.com/led-holiday-lights/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;led holiday lights&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a shot at estimating the opportunity cost of one of these towers in NYC a while back.<br />
<a href="http://www.lightenergydesigns.com/led-holiday-lights/" rel="nofollow">led holiday lights</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Nelson</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Quiz: Let&#039;s say we have two identical buildings, next to each other, in a dense city. Mine is filled with orange trees, and yours is filled with medical offices, advertising agencies, etc. After one year, which building will have produced more oranges?

If the answer is my building, then all that is needed is a zoning change, and the profit motive will do the rest.

If the answer is your building, then massive subsidies (or a philanthropist) would be needed to replace the office building with orange trees. Such subsidies would be taken from taxpayers in exchange for...a smaller chance of so-called &quot;global warming&quot;? 

Faith rests on the unmeasurable and unverifiable. And it&#039;s in the name of faith that people can be most easily duped into anything.

The environmental problem was solved long ago by the accumulation of wealth that enabled people to buy clean air. Poor people cannot afford catalytic converters, poor companies cannot afford efficient technologies, and people in rich countries can pay people in poor countries to produce pollution (and simultaneously make them better off).  

One more thing: Agriculture is filthy business. Pesticides, fertilizer runoff, animal waste, flies, and so forth are not part of the romantic image of the &quot;family farm&quot; and so are generally not considered by the urban population.

And besides, we already have urban agriculture. It&#039;s called a &quot;plant nursery&quot;. No subsidies needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quiz: Let&#8217;s say we have two identical buildings, next to each other, in a dense city. Mine is filled with orange trees, and yours is filled with medical offices, advertising agencies, etc. After one year, which building will have produced more oranges?</p>
<p>If the answer is my building, then all that is needed is a zoning change, and the profit motive will do the rest.</p>
<p>If the answer is your building, then massive subsidies (or a philanthropist) would be needed to replace the office building with orange trees. Such subsidies would be taken from taxpayers in exchange for&#8230;a smaller chance of so-called &#8220;global warming&#8221;? </p>
<p>Faith rests on the unmeasurable and unverifiable. And it&#8217;s in the name of faith that people can be most easily duped into anything.</p>
<p>The environmental problem was solved long ago by the accumulation of wealth that enabled people to buy clean air. Poor people cannot afford catalytic converters, poor companies cannot afford efficient technologies, and people in rich countries can pay people in poor countries to produce pollution (and simultaneously make them better off).  </p>
<p>One more thing: Agriculture is filthy business. Pesticides, fertilizer runoff, animal waste, flies, and so forth are not part of the romantic image of the &#8220;family farm&#8221; and so are generally not considered by the urban population.</p>
<p>And besides, we already have urban agriculture. It&#8217;s called a &#8220;plant nursery&#8221;. No subsidies needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Nelson</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-8390</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-8390</guid>
		<description>Quiz: Let&#039;s say we have two identical buildings, next to each other, in a dense city. Mine is filled with orange trees, and yours is filled with medical offices, advertising agencies, etc. After one year, which building will have produced more oranges?

If the answer is my building, then all that is needed is a zoning change, and the profit motive will do the rest.

If the answer is your building, then massive subsidies (or a philanthropist) would be needed to replace the office building with orange trees. Such subsidies would be taken from taxpayers in exchange for...a smaller chance of so-called &quot;global warming&quot;? 

Faith rests on the unmeasurable and unverifiable. And it&#039;s in the name of faith that people can be most easily duped into anything.

The environmental problem was solved long ago by the accumulation of wealth that enabled people to buy clean air. Poor people cannot afford catalytic converters, poor companies cannot afford efficient technologies, and people in rich countries can pay people in poor countries to produce pollution (and simultaneously make them better off).  

One more thing: Agriculture is filthy business. Pesticides, fertilizer runoff, animal waste, flies, and so forth are not part of the romantic image of the &quot;family farm&quot; and so are generally not considered by the urban population.

And besides, we already have urban agriculture. It&#039;s called a &quot;plant nursery&quot;. No subsidies needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quiz: Let&#8217;s say we have two identical buildings, next to each other, in a dense city. Mine is filled with orange trees, and yours is filled with medical offices, advertising agencies, etc. After one year, which building will have produced more oranges?</p>
<p>If the answer is my building, then all that is needed is a zoning change, and the profit motive will do the rest.</p>
<p>If the answer is your building, then massive subsidies (or a philanthropist) would be needed to replace the office building with orange trees. Such subsidies would be taken from taxpayers in exchange for&#8230;a smaller chance of so-called &#8220;global warming&#8221;? </p>
<p>Faith rests on the unmeasurable and unverifiable. And it&#8217;s in the name of faith that people can be most easily duped into anything.</p>
<p>The environmental problem was solved long ago by the accumulation of wealth that enabled people to buy clean air. Poor people cannot afford catalytic converters, poor companies cannot afford efficient technologies, and people in rich countries can pay people in poor countries to produce pollution (and simultaneously make them better off).  </p>
<p>One more thing: Agriculture is filthy business. Pesticides, fertilizer runoff, animal waste, flies, and so forth are not part of the romantic image of the &#8220;family farm&#8221; and so are generally not considered by the urban population.</p>
<p>And besides, we already have urban agriculture. It&#8217;s called a &#8220;plant nursery&#8221;. No subsidies needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Urbanism</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Urbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-63</guid>
		<description>I also added you to the blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also added you to the blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarketUrbanism</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-8389</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketUrbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-8389</guid>
		<description>I also added you to the blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also added you to the blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Urbanism</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Urbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  I added a link to your article from the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I added a link to your article from the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarketUrbanism</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-8388</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketUrbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-8388</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  I added a link to your article from the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I added a link to your article from the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/19/does-urban-farming-make-sense/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=49#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis.  #4 is the biggest reason, I think.  I took a shot at estimating the opportunity cost of one of these towers in NYC a while back.     http://austinzoning.typepad.com/austincontrarian/2007/05/very_very_expen.htmlA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis.  #4 is the biggest reason, I think.  I took a shot at estimating the opportunity cost of one of these towers in NYC a while back.     <a href="http://austinzoning.typepad.com/austincontrarian/2007/05/very_very_expen.htmlA" rel="nofollow">http://austinzoning.typepad.com/austincontrarian/2007/05/very_very_expen.htmlA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

